|
|
|
PHYSIOTERAPY PROGRAMME
COURSE DESCRIPTION
|
| Name of the Course Unit
| Code
| Year
| Semester
| In-Class Hours (T+P)
| Credit
| ECTS Credit
|
| DEONTOLOGY AND ETHICS IN HEALTH SCIENCES |
SHM202 |
2 |
4 |
2+0 |
2.0 |
4.0 |
| General Information |
| Language of Instruction |
Turkish |
| Level of the Course Unit |
Associate's Degree, TYYÇ: Level 5, EQF-LLL: Level 5, QF-EHEA: Short Cycle |
| Type of the Course |
Compulsory |
| Mode of Delivery of the Course Unit |
Face-to-face |
| Work Placement(s) Requirement for the Course Unit |
Yes |
| Coordinator of the Course Unit |
|
| Instructor(s) of the Course Unit |
|
| Assistant(s) of the Course Unit |
|
| Prerequisites and/or co-requisities of the course unit |
| CATEGORY OF THE COURSE UNIT |
|---|
| Category of the Course Unit |
Degree of Contribution (%) |
| Fundamental Course in the field |
% 40 |
| Course providing specialised skills to the main field |
% 40 |
| Course providing supportive skills to the main field |
- |
| Course providing humanistic, communication and management skills |
% 10 |
| Course providing transferable skills |
% 10 |
| Objectives and Contents |
| Objectives of the Course Unit |
The main aim of the course; to develop a clear understanding of ethics and deontology in the health sciences and services; students will gain knowledge and experience on ethics and deontology in health sciences and services. |
| Contents of the Course Unit |
Subjects such as the definition and principles of deontology, ethical principles and theories, professional ethical codes, ethical decision making, regulations on ethical issues, ethical problems and analysis frequently seen in health sciences and services constitute the content of the course. |
| Contribution of the Course Intending to Provide the Professional Education |
|
No
|
Key Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit
On successful completion of this course unit, students/learners will or will be able to:
|
| 1 |
Will be able to understand related concepts/theories. | | 2 |
Will be able to discuss the validity of related concepts/theories. | | 3 |
Will be able to discuss possible real-life applications of related concepts/theories and offer suggestions. | | 4 |
Will be able to apply relevant concepts/theories to real life/other given situations/cases | | 5 |
Will be able to critically analyze the real-life applications of related concepts/theories. | | 6 |
Will be able to synthesize different concepts and theories to create their own unique approaches. | | 7 |
Will be able to develop an original approach to related concepts. | | 8 |
Will be able to develop/create a new approach. | | 9 |
Able to carry out the given work independently; will be able to work in a group on a given work. | | 10 |
Will be able to apply the principles of academic work to produce an academic work. |
| Weekly Course Contents and Study Materials for Preliminary & Further Study |
| Week |
Topics (Subjects) |
Preparatory & Further Activities |
| 1 |
Login; the purpose of the course and learning outcomes, |
No file found
|
| 2 |
Basic concepts and definitions related to science and health science, |
No file found
|
| 3 |
Basic concepts, definitions and theories related to Morality, Deontology and Ethics, |
No file found
|
| 4 |
The importance of deontology and ethics in health sciences and their development in social, philosophical and other historical processes, |
No file found
|
| 5 |
Universal issues that are effective in deontology and ethical practices in health sciences -1:
- Scientific subjects,
- Legal issues,
- Economic issues,
- Social issues,
- Gender issues,
- Technology-related Issues,
- intercultural and spirituality/spiritual and religious issues, |
No file found
|
| 6 |
Midterm Exam |
No file found
|
| 7 |
Universal issues that are effective in deontology and ethical practices in health sciences -2:
- Global consciousness in the 21st century,
- Professional issues,
- Professional relationship issues,
- Health policy issues,
- Practice issues related to free will in patients, |
No file found
|
| 8 |
Ethical considerations and requirements in health sciences -1:
- Ethics review board approval,
- Scientific usefulness and merit,
- Social value,
- risks and benefits,
- Informed consent,
- Confidentiality of personal information,
- Conflict of roles,
- Respect for intellectual rights,
-Openness, |
No file found
|
| 9 |
Ethical considerations and requirements in health sciences -2:
- Objectivity,
- Honesty,
- Don't be careful,
- Respect for colleagues,
- Do not discriminate,
- Compliance with the legislation,
- Respect for human rights and dignity and protection of human subjects,
- Respect for animal rights and respect and care for animal subjects,
- Responsible consultancy,
- Responsible publication,
- Notifying, |
No file found
|
| 10 |
Ethical obligation in health sciences and research, |
No file found
|
| 11 |
Institutional, national and international codes, declarations, principles, standards and policies for ethics in health sciences |
No file found
|
| 12 |
Ethical decision making for ethical problems and dilemmas in health sciences, |
No file found
|
| 13 |
The future of deontology and ethics in health sciences; career development in deontology and ethics in health sciences, |
No file found
|
| 14 |
final exam |
No file found
|
| SOURCE MATERIALS & RECOMMENDED READING |
|---|
1- Bayet, A. (2000). Science ethics. trans. Vedat Gunyol. Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası.
2-Beauchamp T.L. and Childres, J.F. (1989). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford Press.
3- Bernard, L.O. (2009). Resolving ethical dilemmas A Guide for clinicians. 4th ed. California: Walters Kluwer.
4- Burkhardt, M.A. and Nathaniel, A.K. (2013). Ethics in contemporary nursing. 3.bs. trans. S.E. Alpar, N. Bahcecik, U. Black leg. Istanbul: Istanbul Medical Bookstore.
5- Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (1985). International guiding principles for biomedical research involving animals. Geneva: CIOMS.
6- Council of Europe. (1997). Convention on human rights and biomedicine.
7- Council of Europe. (2005). Additional protocol to the convention on human rights and biomedicine, concerning biomedical research.
8- Cobanoglu, N. (2007). Medical ethics. Ankara: Eflatun Publishing House.
9- Cobanoglu, N. (2009). Theoretical and applied medical ethics. Ankara: Gazi University. Foundation Economic Enterprises Principle Publishing House.
10- World Medical Association. (2005). Handbook of medical ethics. trans. Murat Civaner. Ankara: Turkish Medical Association.
11- Elliott, D. and Stern, J.E. (1997). Research ethics: A reader. Hanover: University Press of New England.
12- European Union. (2001). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Official Journal of the European Communities, L121/34.
13- Fluss, S.S. (2000). International guidelines on bioethics: Informal listing of selected international codes, declarations, guidelines, etc. on medical ethics/ bioethics/ health care ethics/ human rights aspects of health. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.
14- Gabr, M. (2006). Health ethics, equity and human dignity. Journal of human dignity and humiliation studies.
15- Göksel, F.A. (1986). Deontology repetitorium. Ankara.
16- Göksel, F.A. (1994). From ethics to deontology: Formation of binding rules. Journal of medical ethics, 2 (1).
17- Khatami, H. (1999). Medical ethics: Theory and practice issues. Istanbul: Tavaslı Printing.
18- İşgüden, B. and Çabuk, A. (2006). Professional ethics and the effects of professional ethics on professional life. Balıkesir University Social Sciences Institute journal, 9:16.
19- National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1988). Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office.
20- Nuremberg code. (1947). available online at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html accessed 15 February 2013.
21- Resnik, D. (2011). What is ethics in research & Why is it important? North Carolina: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
22- Shamoo, A. and Resnik, D. (2009). Responsible conduct of research. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
23- Plane, N.O., First, H.G. (2008). Scientific ethics and plagiarism. Turkish librarianship, 22 (2).
24- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2006) Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Paris: UNESCO.
25- United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2005). Title 45 – Public welfare, Part 46 – Protection of human subjects.
26- Williams, J. R. (2009). The World Medical Association medical ethics manual, The World Medical Association.
27- World Health Organization. (2004). A practical guide for health researchers. by Mahmoud F. Fathalla and Mohamed M.F. Fathalla. Cairo: WHO Regional Publications, Eastern Mediterranean Series; 30.
28- World Health Organization. (2009). Casebook on ethical issues in international health research. Ed. by Richard Cash … [et al]. Geneva: WHO Press.
29- World Health Organization. (2009). Research ethics committees: Basic concepts for capacity-building. Geneva: WHO Press.
30- World Health Organization. (2011). Standards and operational guidance for ethics review of health-related research with human participants. Geneva: WHO Press.
31- World Medical Association. (2008). World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
32- World Medical Association. (2009). Medical ethics manual. 2nd. ed. World Medical Association. |
| MATERIAL SHARING |
|---|
| Course Notes |
No file found |
| Presentations |
No file found |
| Homework |
No file found |
| Exam Questions & Solutions |
No file found |
| Useful Links |
No file found |
| Video and Visual Materials |
No file found |
| Other |
No file found |
| Announcements |
No file found |
|
CONTRIBUTION OF THE COURSE UNIT TO THE PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES
|
|
KNOWLEDGE
|
|
Theoretical
|
| No |
PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES |
LEVEL OF CONTRIBUTION* |
| 0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 1 |
Will serve as intermediate elements being equipped with basic knowledge in the field of health senses and information competency in practice. | | | | | | X |
| 2 |
Related to the health field in relation to access to information and technology competence in using ways and means. | | | | | | X |
| 3 |
Informative and effective way to communicate and to with patients operations can. | | | | | | X |
| 4 |
Determined according to scientific date and produce solutions to problems. | | | | | | X |
| 5 |
As related to the field controllers to recognize the competence to monitor technological developments on related. | | | | | | X |
| 6 |
According to its own assessment of each patient. | | | | | | X |
|
SKILLS
|
|
Cognitive
|
| No |
PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES |
LEVEL OF CONTRIBUTION* |
| 0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 1 |
Were able to carry the responsibility of professional competence. | | | | | | X |
| 2 |
Practice enough to have. | | | | | | X |
| 3 |
Habit to follow the information of the profession. | | | | | | X |
| 4 |
Habit competence in lifelong learning and self-improvement | | | | | | X |
|
PERSONAL & OCCUPATIONAL COMPETENCES IN TERMS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING GROUPS
|
|
Autonomy & Responsibility
|
| No |
PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES |
LEVEL OF CONTRIBUTION* |
| 0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 1 |
Fulfill their responsibilities | | | | | | X |
|
Learning to Learn
|
| No |
PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES |
LEVEL OF CONTRIBUTION* |
| 0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 1 |
Practical applications the ability to apply adequate level of | | | | | | X |
|
Communication & Social
|
| No |
PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES |
LEVEL OF CONTRIBUTION* |
| 0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 1 |
Team work and the ability to perform | | | | | | X |
| 2 |
Transmitting information to establish effective communication with patients in a way that can process | | | | | | X |
|
Occupational and/or Vocational
|
| No |
PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES |
LEVEL OF CONTRIBUTION* |
| 0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 1 |
Application of ethical principles and professional values proficiency | | | | | | X |
| *Level of Contribution (0-5): Empty-Null (0), 1- Very Low, 2- Low, 3- Medium, 4- High, 5- Very High |
No
|
Key Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit
On successful completion of this course unit, students/learners will or will be able to:
|
PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES |
| 1 |
Will be able to understand related concepts/theories. | | | 2 |
Will be able to discuss the validity of related concepts/theories. | | | 3 |
Will be able to discuss possible real-life applications of related concepts/theories and offer suggestions. | | | 4 |
Will be able to apply relevant concepts/theories to real life/other given situations/cases | | | 5 |
Will be able to critically analyze the real-life applications of related concepts/theories. | | | 6 |
Will be able to synthesize different concepts and theories to create their own unique approaches. | | | 7 |
Will be able to develop an original approach to related concepts. | | | 8 |
Will be able to develop/create a new approach. | | | 9 |
Able to carry out the given work independently; will be able to work in a group on a given work. | | | 10 |
Will be able to apply the principles of academic work to produce an academic work. | |
| Assessment |
| Assessment & Grading of In-Term Activities |
Number ofActivities |
Degree of Contribution (%) |
| Mid-Term Exam |
1 |
% 60 |
| Computer Based Presentation |
0 |
- |
| Short Exam |
0 |
- |
| Presentation of Report |
0 |
- |
| Homework Assessment |
0 |
- |
| Oral Exam |
0 |
- |
| Presentation of Thesis |
0 |
- |
| Presentation of Document |
0 |
- |
| Expert Assessment |
0 |
- |
| Board Exam |
0 |
- |
| Practice Exam |
0 |
- |
| Year-End Final Exam |
1 |
% 40 |
| Internship Exam |
0 |
- |
| TOTAL |
2 |
%100 |
|---|
|
| Contribution of In-Term Assessments to Overall Grade |
2 |
%50 |
| Contribution of Final Exam to Overall Grade |
1 |
%50 |
| TOTAL |
3 |
%100 |
| WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE UNIT |
|---|
| Workload for Learning & Teaching Activities |
|---|
| Type of the Learning Activites |
Learning Activities
(# of week) |
Duration(hours, h) |
Workload (h) |
| Lecture & In-Class Activities |
14 |
0 |
0 |
| Preliminary & Further Study |
14 |
0 |
0 |
| Land Surveying |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Group Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Laboratory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Reading |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Assignment (Homework) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Project Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Seminar |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Internship |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Technical Visit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Web Based Learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Implementation/Application/Practice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Practice at a workplace |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Occupational Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Social Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Thesis Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Field Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Report Writing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Total Workload for Learning & Teaching Activities |
- |
- |
0 |
| Workload for Assessment Activities |
|---|
| Type of the Assessment Activites |
# of Assessment Activities
|
Duration(hours, h) |
Workload (h) |
| Final Exam |
1 |
0 |
0 |
| Preparation for the Final Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Mid-Term Exam |
1 |
0 |
0 |
| Preparation for the Mid-Term Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Preparation for the Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Total Workload for Assessment Activities |
- |
- |
0 |
|
|---|
| Total Workload of the Course Unit |
- |
- |
0 |
| Workload (h) / 25.5 |
|
0.0 |
| ECTS Credits allocated for the Course Unit |
|
4.0 |
|
